We here at MAXfunds.com obviously are pretty fond of mutual funds. After all, we've been encouraging readers of the site to invest in them since MAXfunds began way back in 1999 (though with more than a healthy dose of criticism and contrarian opinion). But while we think mutual funds are the best investment choice for just about everybody, they aren't perfect. One of their biggest drawback is the way investors in mutual funds are taxed.
When you invest in a mutual fund, you are essentially handing your money over to somebody else to invest for you. Because you lose direct control over your investments, you also lose control of your tax situation. If a fund manager sells a stock for a profit and has no losses to counter the gain, you are liable to pay a tax on that profit even if you haven't sold any of your shares in the fund. That means in any given year you could be hit with a monster tax bill clear out of left field - even if you didn't sell a single share of the fund.
Chuck Jaffe from Marketwatch reports on a law pending in Congress that would dramatically change how mutual funds are taxed.
The Generate Retirement Ownership Through Long-Term Holding Act of 2007 -- call it the GROWTH Act -- was introduced in June by Rep. Paul Ryan, R-Wis., effectively rehashing a sound proposal that he has put forth several times since 2003. The bill would allow fund investors to defer capital gains taxes on reinvested distributions until the fund is sold, a change that would simplify personal accounting, make fund investing more attractive and that would put funds on a similar tax plane as stocks."
The effect would be to turn every mutual fund portfolios into a kind of junior Roth IRA:
Allowing an investor to save in a fund without paying taxes on distributions indefinitely effectively creates the "lifetime savings account" that so many politicos have kicked around in recent years. For a buy-and-hold investor, it turns a "taxable fund account" into the equivalent of a traditional IRA, without the contribution limits. (Traditional IRAs require payment of taxes only upon withdrawal but allow investors to trade in and out of securities without generating a tax bill; in an ordinary taxable account, every trade is a taxable event.)"
For fund investors, we think this is a no-brainer. If you agree, why not drop your congressperson a line and tell them to get behind it. For many investors it would be a bigger investing tax break than the recent dividend tax cut.
We here at MAXfunds.com obviously are pretty fond of mutual funds. After all, we've been encouraging readers of the site to invest in them since MAXfunds began way back in 1999 (though with more than a healthy dose of criticism and contrarian opinion). But while we think mutual funds are the best investment choice for just about everybody, they aren't perfect. One of their biggest drawback is the way investors in mutual funds are taxed.
When you invest in a mutual fund, you are essentially handing your money over to somebody else to invest for you. Because you lose direct control over your investments, you also lose control of your tax situation. If a fund manager sells a stock for a profit and has no losses to counter the gain, you are liable to pay a tax on that profit even if you haven't sold any of your shares in the fund. That means in any given year you could be hit with a monster tax bill clear out of left field - even if you didn't sell a single share of the fund.
Chuck Jaffe from Marketwatch reports on a law pending in Congress that would dramatically change how mutual funds are taxed.
The Generate Retirement Ownership Through Long-Term Holding Act of 2007 -- call it the GROWTH Act -- was introduced in June by Rep. Paul Ryan, R-Wis., effectively rehashing a sound proposal that he has put forth several times since 2003. The bill would allow fund investors to defer capital gains taxes on reinvested distributions until the fund is sold, a change that would simplify personal accounting, make fund investing more attractive and that would put funds on a similar tax plane as stocks."
The effect would be to turn every mutual fund portfolios into a kind of junior Roth IRA:
Allowing an investor to save in a fund without paying taxes on distributions indefinitely effectively creates the "lifetime savings account" that so many politicos have kicked around in recent years. For a buy-and-hold investor, it turns a "taxable fund account" into the equivalent of a traditional IRA, without the contribution limits. (Traditional IRAs require payment of taxes only upon withdrawal but allow investors to trade in and out of securities without generating a tax bill; in an ordinary taxable account, every trade is a taxable event.)"
For fund investors, we think this is a no-brainer. If you agree, why not drop your congressperson a line and tell them to get behind it. For many investors it would be a bigger investing tax break than the recent dividend tax cut.
LINK